AI revenue cycle platform for RCM teams

From chart
to cash.

AI codes the chart across inpatient, outpatient, and HCC. 78 deterministic rules clear the claim before it leaves. When payers deny anyway, the same AI reads the 835, tells you why, and drafts the appeal. Your coders review and approve every claim before it goes out.

Chart
Code
Validate
Submit
Paid

Discharge summary received

HIPAA Compliant
IP · OP · HCC Coding
78 Validation Rules
MS-DRG v43.1 Grouper
HCC V28 Risk Model
NCCI Edits + MUE Limits
LCD Medical Necessity
837 / 835 / CARC / RARC
AI Appeal Drafting
CMS FY2026 Official Data
Custom Payer Rules
Full Audit Trail
Human-in-the-Loop Review
HIPAA Compliant
IP · OP · HCC Coding
78 Validation Rules
MS-DRG v43.1 Grouper
HCC V28 Risk Model
NCCI Edits + MUE Limits
LCD Medical Necessity
837 / 835 / CARC / RARC
AI Appeal Drafting
CMS FY2026 Official Data
Custom Payer Rules
Full Audit Trail
Human-in-the-Loop Review

Revenue leaks at both ends of the cycle

Coding tools stop at the code. Denial tools start at the denial. The leak lives in between.

1 in 9

claims denied on first submission

The average initial denial rate sits above 11%. Most of it traces back to coding errors, missing authorizations, and medical necessity gaps that were knowable before submission.

65%

of denied claims are never reworked

Denial rework is manual, slow, and staffed by the same people who are behind on coding. Appeals with real recovery odds die in queues.

$25+

average cost to rework a single claim

Every denial that could have been prevented costs twice: once in staff time to rework it, and again in the payment that arrives months late or never.

How it works

Follow one claim through the platform

Progress note

...pt with type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia, continues metformin. BP elevated, essential hypertension managed with lisinopril. Detailed history, moderate MDM...

E11.65HCC 37

T2DM w/ hyperglycemia

I10Dx 2

Essential hypertension

99214CPT

E/M level 4

3 codes assigned. Each one traces back to a highlighted span in the note. Nothing without evidence.
Coding coverage

One AI pipeline. Three lines of business.

The same evidence-linked engine codes inpatient, outpatient, and risk adjustment. What changes is the deterministic layer on top.

IP

Inpatient

Facility coding with live financial impact.

  • ICD-10-CM and PCS with evidence links
  • Live MS-DRG grouping with estimated payment
  • CC/MCC capture, POA enforcement, HAC detection
  • 38 deterministic rules from CMS MCE edits and coding guidelines

DRG 470

Major joint replacement · $12,894 est. payment

OP

Outpatient

Professional and facility CPT/HCPCS coding.

  • CPT and HCPCS with modifiers, POS, and laterality
  • NCCI procedure-to-procedure edits
  • MUE unit limits per code
  • LCD medical necessity by MAC jurisdiction · 40 rules total

99214 · 25

E/M level 4 with modifier 25 · NCCI clean

HCC

Risk adjustment

HCC capture for Medicare Advantage populations.

  • Diagnosis capture from outpatient documentation
  • Deterministic ICD-10 to HCC V28 mapping
  • MEAT validation on every captured condition
  • RAF impact shown per chart, per condition

HCC 37

Diabetes w/ complication · RAF +0.166

Denial management

Denials are a workflow, not a write-off

The validator blocks coding denials before submission. For everything payers reject anyway, the denial workbench turns the 835 into a ranked, explained, recoverable queue.

Denial worklistRanked by recovery priority
CLM-4872CO-50$4,200
CLM-4901CO-16$3,800
CLM-4756CO-97$2,100
CLM-4803CO-15$1,950
CLM-4699CO-29$890

Open

147

$234,500

In appeal

23

$67,800

Recovered

$0

this month

835 parsing, line by line

Upload remittances or pull them from your clearinghouse. Every CARC and RARC lands on the exact service line it belongs to, categorized by root cause: coding, authorization, eligibility, medical necessity, bundling, timely filing.

The AI explains, then recommends

For each denial: what the payer is actually saying, whether it is worth fighting, and the specific fix. Appeal, correct and resubmit, or write off, each with a reason you can defend.

Appeals drafted from the chart

When a denial links back to an encounter coded in Pulse Coder, the appeal letter cites the exact clinical documentation that satisfies the coverage criteria. No hunting through records. Every draft goes to your team for review, nothing is sent automatically.

A worklist that ranks itself

Priority is computed from dollar value, filing deadline, and historical recovery odds per denial category. Your team always works the most recoverable dollars first.

Competitors do coding or denials. Pulse Coder closes the loop: prevent what you can, recover what you can't, and feed every denial pattern back into the rules that prevent the next one.

Payer rules engine

Every payer plays by different rules. So does the validator.

Custom rules live in one library per organization and get bundled into named config sets. Assign a set per clinic or client, and every coder on that account works against the right rulebook automatically.

IFpayer = Medicare AND code = 99397
THENflag: use G0439 for annual wellness visits

CMS rules ship configured

Every organization starts with all 78 built-in rules live: MCE, NCCI, MUE, LCD, POA, HAC, Excludes1/2. Zero setup before the first chart.

Add only what differs

Write the handful of rules that vary payer to payer: a Medicare code substitution, a commercial modifier requirement, a documentation threshold. Scope each rule to specific payers.

Override without losing visibility

Downgrade or suppress any built-in rule for a specific payer. Suppressed flags stay visible in their own bucket, never silently dropped from the audit trail.

Dry run before it goes live

Test any rule against your recent claims first. See exactly where it fires, and where it conflicts with existing rules, before it touches production coding.

Built on the actual CMS source files

The deterministic layer is compiled from official CMS data, refreshed each fiscal year. Not scraped, not approximated.

78

deterministic validation rules

180,000+

Excludes1/2 exclusion pairs

332,000+

POA-exempt codes tracked

917

ICD-10-PCS tables

v43.1

MS-DRG grouper, FY2026 CMS data

V28

HCC risk adjustment model

HIPAA Compliant

PHI never touches the LLM

All AI inference runs on de-identified clinical text inside a private, isolated AWS environment. Field-level encryption on sensitive data, tamper-resistant audit trails, per-org isolation, and a signed BAA before any patient data moves. Data stays in your chosen region: US or India.

Read the security overview

Stop leaking revenue at both ends

Code it right the first time. Recover what payers deny anyway. One platform, one audit trail, HIPAA compliant.